Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherie Merlis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. A2 of ms:wiki Jac 16888  Talk 18:33, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Sherie Merlis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The whole article is written in some foreign language. References given at end are wrong Sulaimandaud (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

page has been deleted previously as a test page. Some parts like filmography, seem to be copied from Angelina Jolie.220  of  Borg 15:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unreferenced BLP. I had BLP Prod tagged this because I didn't see an AFD template, but you seem to have reverted your addition. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:35, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete as not rising to the creative status required, fails WP:ENTERTAINER & WP:CREATIVE, and lacking coverage, fails WP:GNG. This Malaysian actress does not have an article on the Bahasa Melayu Wikipedia, but she is mentioned there in the cast of a couple of movies, Janin (film) and Leftenan Adnan (film). The awards in the infobox are spurious, as mentioned above.   lists the same two movies that the Bahasa Melayu Wikipedia listed her under. --Bejnar (talk) 16:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The reasons given for the deletion nomination weren't proper grounds for it. Articles written in foreign languages, unless delete-worthy for another reason, are treated as described at WP:Pages needing translation into English. Basically, there's a two-week grace period to see if anyone translates them; if not, they get PRODded. As for references being in the wrong place, we don't delete articles for being formatted incorrectly. We repair them or tag them for others to repair.
 * Regarding the Angelina Jolie material, I'm supposing that the creator took Angelina Jolie as a template and hasn't finished adapting it yet. It would have been better done in a draft space, but it would have been premature to interfere this soon. Even if the filmography was still there after a few hours, the proper course of action would have been to delete that content, not the page, since the rest of the material is about the article's subject.
 * Unlike a regular PROD tag, a BLPPROD tag can and should be replaced if someone removes it without supplying an appropriate reference.
 * I'll do my own notability check since notability is a concern in any case, I just haven't done it yet.
 * —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:13, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.