Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheriff Charlie Mills


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Harper's Island. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Sheriff Charlie Mills

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Non-notable fictional characters from a canceled short-run TV series with no real-world information, likely none available to support their own article. Ejfetters (talk) 07:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect all to the show's article, which is does a far better job of listing the characters as they get bumped off. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 11:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect There is no justificiation given in the nomination to argue why a redirect is unsuitable, so it is not a question for AfD. DGG (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect all per DGG. Trout to the nominator for excessive use of mostly-irrelevant tags on the articles themselves. Jclemens (talk) 05:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * There are a lot of tags, but IMO they all are valid for the articles in their current state.Ejfetters (talk) 10:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect all per DGG. Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:06, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect 74.204.40.46 (talk) 20:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect is sufficient. The information is already there and I planned on doing a redirect if they were deleted, so this seems acceptable.  The articles are pure fancruft and nothing of notability that needs to be merged. Ejfetters (talk) 10:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect is fine for most of these, but the article Chloe Carter should be about the actual Ziegfield Follies girl who became the lesbian partner of Rudolf Valentino's first wife, Jean Acker, rather than a redirect to a fictional character. - Nunh-huh 01:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.