Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherry Boudreau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Even though the nominator withdrew the nomination, the consensus is clearly "delete". &mdash; J I P | Talk 09:46, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Sherry Boudreau
Delete originally, but some work has gone into reverting the page to a definite attempt at non-vanity, with NPOV. So, maybe it's now Leave. Budgiekiller 17:09, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now.  Speedy keep, since nominator seems to have changed his mind before even finishing the afd (!). &mdash;Cryptic (talk) 08:00, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete There's no actual claim to notability in the article and the autobiog mentioned is crystal ball, so I would have completed this Afd myself if I had found it. Agree it's no longer a clear vanity article.     Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   10:44, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The article obviously does make a claim of notability, and a quick google seems to confirm it. It started off as vanity, but isn't any more.  It still needs to state what she's accomplished in the first sentence (instead of later), and it needs more specifics (which are easily found in Google),  but any problems the article has are fixable.  --rob 11:23, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I must be missing something - what's the claim to notability?  Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   12:06, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I actually misread the article. It doesn't make the claim I "read".  But, googling her, indicates she has had some recognition in bodybuilding, or more accurately bodybuilding modeling.   But, I haven't spent the time to evaluate it yet.  p.s.  There's few things more annoying than making a mistake, and trying to fix it, only to find wikipedia is down, yet again.    --rob 12:27, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Agree she has recognition in bodybuilding modeling and would be hesitant to vote delete in her presence. Yup, wiki is barely alive at present.     Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   14:24, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some notablity is established.. No titles or are stated.  For now NN --Rogerd 03:37, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. Lots of people are wannabe bobybuilders and are clients of more notable coaches, and are in the process of writing their as yet upublished memoirs. MCB 23:58, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.