Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiawase kisa sanchōme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 15:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Shiawase kisa sanchōme

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I cannot tell if it is notable. It also has no references. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) (Shout!) 02:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - 1) Article is less than 24 hours old, so AfD is bad form at best. 2) Based on your nomination rationale, you didn't even attempt WP:BEFORE 3) Its been translated and licensed in two countries. I would, however, suggest this be moved to Happy Cafe. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 13:11, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Please note: The correct title of the series seems to be Shiawase Kissa Sanchōme. I moved the article. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:32, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ... oops, the IP 159.182.1.4 is right, see Malaysia Star article. The title of the series is Happy Cafe . --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:39, 13 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I think we should keep the article under the name Happy Cafe, there's a good possibility to create a well referenced information about this comic book: The Manga Critic Manga Maniac Cafe + the above mentioned reviews in the Malaysia Star. I'll add the sources to the article. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:50, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see no shortage of coverage in my CSE. Didn't even need to clean it up. --Gwern (contribs) 16:06 13 April 2011 (GMT)
 * Keep per the reviews found in Gwern's search. – Allen4names 17:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S. The list item referred to by KrebMarkt below has been moved to Talk:Happy Cafe. – Allen4names 04:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment For information Happy Cafe was an Anime/Manga requested article since at least April 2010. There is enough coverage to warrant an article. --KrebMarkt (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per reviews found.  D r e a m Focus  04:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.