Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shihab S. Asfour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Shihab S. Asfour

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

University professor. A search found only social media profiles and non-independent mentions. Not nearly enough coverage to meet the requirements at WP:GNG. Most of the article is WP:LISTCRUFT.  Omni Flames ( talk ) 09:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:55, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:52, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 23:00, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. This is essentially just a cv, and neither his Google scholar citation counts nor his administrative position are enough to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep GS h-index of 19 in reasonable well-cited field maybe just over the line. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:36, 10 July 2016 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 11:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still enough questionability to suggest deletion is best here.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:01, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't believe he passes WP:PROF. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 22:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.