Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shikha Khanduja Kaul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:56, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Shikha Khanduja Kaul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't appear notable. Creator and the only other significant contributor are both SPAs. The award doesn't seem to be notable either. No result for "times of India Sikha Khanduja". Mirrors and social media only. Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 18:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Usedtobecool  ✉️ ✨ 18:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Usedtobecool  ✉️ ✨ 18:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Usedtobecool  ✉️ ✨ 18:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:51, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: Non notable author, fails WP:GNG also. Meeanaya (talk) 05:44, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete:No reference in WP:RS. Fails WP:Notability—Harshil169 (talk) 09:16, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Practically all OR, supported by a single non-RS source (Merinews, which "allows anyone to share news, opinion, analysis, reviews, photos and events"), started by a SPA whose single career edit was creating this article, extensively nurtured by another SPA Nitijain5 (whose only edits are to this article), ORPHAN, etc. To soapbox here just a bit, this article was prodded shortly after creation (it looked like this), but was deprodded (and detagged) by an experienced editor, who added this knowingly unacceptable source. This sort of behavior only makes more work for other editors. Agricola44 (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR, fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable writer. After adding at least 5 living people whose articles are under discussion for deletion to the category living people just today I am beginning to wonder how many articles we have on living people that are not currently in that category.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:39, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON and lack of good sourcing. No real impact yet; her single award is local and minor. Bearian (talk) 13:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of good sources; even I researched a lot on Google. Not yet a single reliable source to prove notability of her. Awards are local and paid. Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.