Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shilpa tulaskar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles (talk) 03:43, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Shilpa tulaskar

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This person does not appear to meet WP:GNG for actors. No third-party coverage provided, no significance determined, and text like ''from there on there was no looking back. Shilpa is adept at portraying a wide range of emotions'' reads more like WP:RESUME than an encyclopedic article. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep poorly wriiten but can be improved. As far as notability is concerned she has acted in some well known TV serials on nationl television and (to my knowledge at least two) acclaimed Marathi films. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 09:26, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Provide valid third-party sources. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 10:50, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - I have rewritten the article with reliable sources. She meets WP:ENT with her multiple supporting and lead roles in Marathi films and Hindi Television shows. She also meets WP:GNG with multiple reviews for her work and personal coverage in The Hindu and Rediff.--Sodabottle (talk) 14:01, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:ENT. warrior  4321   16:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep per diligent WP:AFTER and improvements by User:Deepak D'Souza and User:Sodabottle. Just goes to show that WP:ATD actually works. Kudos to you both!   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.