Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shimon sandler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. I actually started to userfy this thing, and then changed my mind. First of all, I think Doc glasgow's right--we have no obligation to host people's bios. Second, since this user obviously edited from an IP after making his one edit from his username (to create this article), the account should not be considered active, so what's the point of having content on the userpage. Third, since all of the userfy votes are tentative and paired with delete votes, and Doc's is an emphatic don't userfy, there's no real consensus to userfy anyway. QED!!! If any non-admin wants the text I'll fish it out for you. Chick Bowen 05:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Shimon sandler
Was speedied for CSD-A7 non-notability; contains mild assertion of notability so I changed that to PROD. DePRODded without comment. Marked again for speedy. DeSpeedied without comment. Marked again for speedy. Still doesn't quite qualify for speedy, so now I'm sending it here. Technical nomination - no opinion from me. ➨ ≡ Я Ξ  DVΞRS ≡ 19:43, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Delete- I say delete because the article looks like a vanity article to me. It was created by a user named Shimonsandler who has no other contributions, and then continually improved upon by one anon i.p (12.146.67.12) who also has no other contributions. Philip Gronowski 01:17, 3 May 2006 (UTC) ''This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!'' --Doc  ask?  19:05, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy, then. Stifle (talk) 12:55, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy seems fair. PJM 20:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, or userfy. --Ed (Edgar181) 20:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy or delete -- getcrunk   juice  contribs 20:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Do not userfy (no other vote) I'm fed up with people calling userfy on nn bios. WHY? If it isn't worth an article, then just delete it. Userspace isn't myspace for bios. We don't host nn bios by the back door. If this was an estabilshed user, I'd allow some slack (a few personal details about him in user space might be useful), but he isn't. In any case, it appears the 'author' isn't using the account anymore, so giving him a userpage with a pretty bio would serve no purpose. Please stop voting userfy without good reason. --Doc ask?  21:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.