Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shing02


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (NAC) --J.Mundo (talk) 06:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Shing02


Delete. This is a BLP1E, if that. He wrote a song for a notable cartoon (notability is not inherited) but I honestly cannot even say he is known for that event. In which case he's entirely not notable. JBsupreme (talk) 17:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: check out this, this, this and this for coverage by reliable third-party sources. Ironholds (talk) 18:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep--Per the sources provided by Ironholds and the fact that two others languages Wikipedia have an article about the subject, meets WP:N. --J.Mundo (talk) 18:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Ironholds' sources show that he does meet the notability guideline for musicians since he has been covered by multiple reliable secondary sources.   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 20:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 20:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   --    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 20:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nominator doesn't state what efforts were taken to find sources before nominating but adequate coverage has been shown to exist. More from Google news:, , .--Michig (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep' In addition to what was said above I think he meets the WP:CREATIVE criterion: "The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews." Theme songs are significant enough parts of a work of fiction to for creating it to be considered a major contribution. - Mgm|(talk) 22:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of sources identified. Agreed it's unclear what efforts were made to determine sourcing -- and to add said sourcing -- before nomination was made. WP:BOLD should come before WP:AFD when possible. 23skidoo (talk) 23:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * As should WP:BEFORE. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.   —Fg2 (talk) 10:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Not that it's needed, but keep - meets WP:CREATIVE WP:MUSIC (edited to change my brainfart). —Quasirandom (talk) 14:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.