Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shing Tai Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Shing Tai Road

 * – ( View AfD View log )

prod contested without improvement with rationale being "main road"- no indication why the road is notable. Ohconfucius ¡digame! 06:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. --  Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 06:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found no notability. This is just an average non-notable road. SL93 (talk) 04:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. 175.159.193.30 (talk) 08:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC) — 175.159.193.30 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at This SPA has identical !voting record as 218.250.159.25 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by SchmuckyTheCat (talk • contribs) 21:04, 12 February 2012
 * I have compare the contributions of 175.159.193.30 with my own. Only some of his/her votes are the same as mine. That isn't identical. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 21:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 19:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * See my further comment below. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 21:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete unless shown to be notable. content can be moved to locality or umbrella article. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * Delete. Does not meet WP:N. The subject matter itself is not notable and I see no hope of expanding it to an acceptable standard. Craddocktm (talk) 21:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. If in case this article isn't kept, it should be merged and redirected to Heng Fa Chuen. 218.250.159.25 (talk) 21:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.