Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinji Miyadai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 06:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Shinji Miyadai
Unsourced, no claim to notability. Prod was disputed. Septentrionalis 19:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Non-notable sociologist and assistant professor. -- Nish kid 64 19:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Hello32020 20:06, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep/verify probably noteable and it is not yet prooven. Delete later on if not noteable. New article. User:Yy-bo 21:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I found at 3 English references to him with a quick Google search. Seano1 00:08, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has an extensive article in ja wiki, and if you browse through it he's written a lot of stuff.  ColourBurst 00:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Wpvf 08:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. Still not a real assertion of notability unless the redlinks are notable people;
 * It may be a "new article", but it's not a new user, and the old user was blocked for a time, for, among other things, creating articles on mathematicians while inserting references to their importance in mathematical articles, where that importance was unverified (to User:Yy-bo)
 * The creator was previously banned from the ja wiki and blocked for a period of time here; if it's his article there, it won't be there for long. (to User:ColourBurst).
 * I doubt that it is the same user. The ja article has been around since 2004, and has seen a lot of different editors. Neier 14:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * But, that being said, he may be notable, although the article doesn't have sources even for the marginal claims of notability made. (And I was the prodder.) &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 14:13, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per ja wikipedia and 70 books at Amazon.jp -- Given that the en article is less than two days old, I suspect it will gather its sources in due time. Neier 14:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.