Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinmin no Michi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was keep, reflected in this case by a history merge. Mackensen (talk) 03:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Shinmin no Michi
Author admits it may fail WP:HOAX, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR. DarkAudit 20:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Please point to where the author admits to it being a hoax, so we can speedy it. —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-02 21:50Z 
 * I'm sorry. Tag he used was accuracy. --DarkAudit 21:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep There are references given, so presumably it's not OR. Mostly it seems factual, but any NPOV is not a reason to delete. It's a reason to clean up, which this article certainly needs and is tagged as such. I would be more wary of a copyvio, with a machine translation from an original. The same text is also at Hito-Do. There are some google hits, but you wouldn't expect many for a subject of this kind. Tyrenius 01:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk  to Nihonjo e  04:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, expand, source and cleanup. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjo e  04:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Just needs a good cleaning. - Wickning1
 * Weak Delete The edit-history and discussion of Hito-Do which is the same article of this page should be preserved. Hence, this page should be deleted. After that, Hito-Do should be renamed to Shinmin no Michi.  Hito-Do Should not be redirect page since "Hito-Do" is completely neologistic name.--Questionfromjapan 10:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I completely agree with this. - Wickning1 14:01, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree, too.--Celldea 09:42, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Merge history. It looks like both were created by the same user(s), Torun31 and Torn23; he/they probably didn't know about redirects.  —Quarl (talk) 2006-07-04 06:10Z 
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.