Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiny revolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Singu larity  05:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Shiny revolution

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete: Fails WP:RS and WP:N.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 00:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete Pass the sick bag, Alice... Colonel Warden (talk) 00:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Delete per nom.  Fa ll e n   A n  g el  00:40, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Some dude's comic book: no evidence that it is published, popular, or influential.  Utgard Loki (talk) 16:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 17:11, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can find no WP:RS for this, and therefore this is a failure of WP:NOTE.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 17:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not for manga ideas someone created one day. And what the hell is "anime manga"? --Farix (Talk) 20:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Usually, "anime manga" is a manga made using stills from an anime; I've got the English anime manga volumes for Spirited Away, and have seen them for other Studio Ghibli stuff. This, however, seems to be a different use. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Poking about the intarwebs, I've picked up that this is an as-yet unpublished (or possibly self-published, though I've yet to find ordering info, or indeed any attribution of authorship that isn't a handle) comic book with an anime/manga influenced style. No reviews or other reliable sources to indicate notability. If the author (who claims to be 14) ever gets this published and it gets notice -- and I wish her/him luck -- then no prejudice on recreating the article; until then, though, delete as failing the notability requirement for books. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable, no references or links --Starionwolf (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, plus I would argue that this entire proceding should be deleted from the anime/manga project afd page as this is an american comic and is neither anime nor manga by definition. 208.245.87.2 (talk) 15:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Where would OEL manga be filed, then? Just curious. —Quasirandom (talk) 21:56, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, nothing verifiable to support the article. (jarbarf) (talk) 17:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.