Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shion Tsuji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 00:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Shion Tsuji

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails MUSICBIO. After talk page discussion I have converted from a PROD in order to ensure BIAS is avoided and there is time to discuss the possibility of using other language sources (such as searching for "辻 詩音"). Fæ (talk) 07:33, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 07:34, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 07:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- Fæ (talk) 07:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Comment: Meuuhh. The article facts proving is badly done as none of the references assert anything. Not that accurate & reliable sources don't exist, just that the job was half-done. Oricon charts are available freely so the "subscription only" excuse won't do. --KrebMarkt 07:49, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, the subscription only bit is for the sales figures table. --Prosperosity (talk) 07:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * So fix it with Ｃａｔｃｈ！ほしいものＭ／ｅｌｏｄｙＳｋｙ　ｃｈｏｒｄ～大人になる君へ～Ｃａｎｄｙ　ｋｉｃｋｓ That should be enough to assert Oricon ranking & basic release information. --KrebMarkt 08:03, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Keep: Doesn't fail MUSICBIO, as she has a top 10 hit on the Japan Hot 100 chart as seen here. --Prosperosity (talk) 07:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep based on charting. Edward321 (talk) 13:14, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Charted = notable per WP:MUSIC = keep. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, article meets requirements. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.