Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shippensburg Raiders Roller Hockey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this team is not notable per Wikipedia's standards. North America1000 07:38, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Shippensburg Raiders Roller Hockey

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Full of redlinks. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left. Note that it has been tagged as unsourced since January 2012. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:19, 11 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Non-notable. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Completely non-notable. sixty nine   • speak up •  04:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. WP:SPORTCRIT. SW3 5DL (talk) 04:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom and above reasoning. GauchoDude (talk) 13:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with above posters - totally fails WP:GNG, and is automatically suspect given its creator had an obvious interest in promoting roller hockey. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Nothing about the nomination is correct, and I want to make sure people are voting for the right reasons. Pages were not all created by the same user, and WP:SPORTCRIT only applies to players, not teams. This one may actually fail WP:GNG but that doesn't change the fact that the nomination was in bad faith and the dozens of articles he also nominated easily satisfy it. If you throw a bunch of darts wildly, as nominator has, you're bound to hit something once in a while. Smartyllama (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.