Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ships of Homeworld (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete – original research; fails to cite reliable, independent, verifiable secondary sources; completely in-universe style; prior AFD issues have not been remedied. -- slakr \ talk / 20:56, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Ships of Homeworld
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Third round for this one. Lets see, no sources at all. no real world context at all and I doubt there are reliable sources to add any real world context. Original research problems some of them pretty bad if you read the article. The article was created roughly 2 and half years ago, has been nominated for deletion twice and still has not been improved. I think that makes a pretty clear case that this article will never pass WP:NOT, and WP:RS Ridernyc (talk) 10:43, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have amended the above link to point to the correct place. WP:Plot is under discussion.  SilkTork  * SilkyTalk 13:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Most of this seems to be original research. I suspect at least some of this information could be traced to some game guides or something, but not really for anything independent of the game itself.  A decent summary of this would be more appropriate for the Homeworld article, which isn't even that big at the moment.  Wickethewok (talk) 17:11, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I deleted the info from Homeworld as per WP:GAMEGUIDE. SharkD (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 16:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Gameguide material, cruft, no sources, no reliable secondary sources covering the topic, no real-world significance. SharkD (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Needs to establish notability. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep WP:PLOT redirects to an style page for articles on films, and has nothing to do with the present article. SharkD shows the method some editors seem to adopt in handling this sort of material--delete it from the main article, then delete the separate one. There is no consensus at WP that this material is invalid content, we merely have to decide where to put it. DGG (talk) 20:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.