Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shipston Excelsior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Shipston Excelsior

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod, moving to AFD for further discussion. Procedural nomination, no opinion. A ecis Brievenbus 00:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * delete Nothing at all to establish notability. Only Ghits were the team's own page and this article. Beeblbrox (talk) 00:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not played at a high enough level for notability. Peanut4 (talk) 00:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough relevance. Rsazevedo msg 22:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not verifiable or notable using reliable sources. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the basics are easily verifiable using reliable sources - plenty of hits from Google etc., but they do play way too far down the pyramid to establish notability, so Delete. - fchd (talk) 09:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * (Please ignore, I meant to post this on a different afd but must have had two windows open or something. Either way, I can't explain what it's doing here. Delete; there is no assertion that the subject has ever played professional football, and no evidence that he has. Nowhere near the required level of notability. Robotforaday (talk) 02:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Given that this article is about a football club, your comment doesn't seem to make sense....... ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You're right, no idea what that's doing there! I can only surmise that I was looking up a different player, and then returned to this to comment and remarked on the wrong afd altogether. Splendid. Robotforaday (talk) 10:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete NN. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  09:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.