Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shira Lazar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. -- Cirt (talk) 00:32, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Shira Lazar

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

"Not significant, not verifiable" Mikepolkfan (talk) 08:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Her existence is definitely verifiable, though this article could use improvement.  I wouldn't base her notability on the poor article as it currently stands.--Milowent • talkblp-r  13:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: There are other sources that list her birthday later in May and earlier in the decade of the 70s. Also, there are questions about her work at the "Daily Planet" at her school in the discussion section.  And there's not much else.  Please delete this article, there are plenty more people who are much more accomplished than her.  --Mikepolkfan • talkblp-r  16:00, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * But think of how many people are less notable! The fact that there is conflicting information out there on her is typical of people at her level. (i doubt she was born in the 70s, perhaps there is more than one Shira Lazar, I would assume).--Milowent • talkblp-r  18:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * P.S. Mikepolkfan - I love that you adopted my signature. haha. --Milowent • talkblp-r 18:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Just read the first article in the scant references list. The first line is "First off, Shira Lazar is not a fameball."  Then it goes on, "Lazar personifies the best parts of being a New Yorker: a go-getter, ambitious, self-aware..." when there is no mention of her being a New Yorker in her own article.  In fact it says she's from Canada living in LA.  Wiki does not need any more two paragraph entries on desperate nobodies! Mikepolkfan (talk) 00:24, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, Mike Polk is not a nobody!--Milowent • talkblp-r 03:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, ok, 20 Million views on YouTube versus Shira's exercise video that might break 10,000 by the end of the year! DELETE Mikepolkfan (talk) 04:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If anyone is interested http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MBEL1avd7g Mikepolkfan (talk) 05:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The cleveland tourism videos are hilarious, but WP:HOTTIE("Never delete hot people's pages.") is another keep argument for Shira.--Milowent • talkblp-r 14:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Are you serious? George Clooney, Natalie Portman, Katie Holmes, Adam Brody, Shira Lazar.  Which one of these does NOT belong? Mikepolkfan (talk) 18:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:57, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks DumbBOT! Mikepolkfan (talk) 04:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Gene93k! Mikepolkfan (talk) 17:20, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Sufficient independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources to pass the notability test. --Lambiam 01:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.