Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiraz Dossa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Shiraz Dossa

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Canadian academic primarily known for his attendance at the infamous International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust (the Iranian Holocaust conference. His attendance caused some controversy in Canada a few years ago and this article is basically a defense of Dossa. Based on an examination of Dossa's CV and Google Scholar I don't believe that Dossa's academic work is any more notable than an average Professor. I feel that this page fails WP:ACADEMIC GabrielF (talk) 20:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Shiraz Dossa has a large number of articles on the web providing good primary and secondary sources for inclusion in WP. scope_creep (talk) 13:06, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:01, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:PROF - gscholar (h index = 6) and gnews searches not remarkable. As for his conference attendance, that falls squarely under WP:BLP1E. Altogether, an unremarkable person. Ray  Talk 16:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another one with GS h index of 6. Does not make WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2010 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per WP:BIO1E, WP:NOTSCANDAL, and lack of evidence of passing WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:56, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.