Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirley Braha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nja 247 13:21, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Shirley Braha

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason Syntheticlife4m (talk) 02:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC) This doesn't apply to Wikipedia's guidelines for notoriety for living biographies. Looking at the references provided, this appears to be a momentary person of minimal local fame, not a major political figure or celebrity with any potential of lasting importance.


 * OBJECT TO DELETION Braha pioneered a new genre of music video show in the post-MTV era, and has become an industry unto herself in the Indie and Underground music scene. Article is in desperate need of additional sources and citations, but a quick search online will reveal the depth of her influence on a major niche of the music industry. DELETION IS NOT APPROPRIATE MEASURE FOR THIS ARTICLE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.105.157.254 (talk) 04:00, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Calm down, will you? Anyway, weak keep because she does pull up some moderate Google hits. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 15:57, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

DeleteMentioning in a number of publications doesn't automatically mean that it is suitable for wikipedia. The article is awful and does little to explain why the biography is worthy of note. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 17:32, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article clearly needs work, but the show mentioned is a famous show, and has connections across the continental United States (including that alternative Seattle radio station - KEXP or something). Besides, it looks a lot like this was a false alarm - the user who created this is a brand new user whose only contributions are a few select AfD's. Ulterior motive? Luminifer (talk) 11:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've done quite a bit of cleanup, and there are plenty of sources there, especially when taken together as a whole. The nom has listed about a half-dozen individuals related to a New York production company, after which the nomination is flooded with hyperbolic responses from a set of IP users (often TYPING IN ALL CAPS). This is notable. Shadowjams (talk) 20:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources seem good enough, notable. Taelus (talk) 15:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is yet another in a set of incomplete nominations of seemingly-notable New York producers by single-purpose-account Syntheticlife4m, each of which have been followed by objections from capslocked single-purpose-account IPs. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.