Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirley Chambers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Shirley Chambers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

To begin with, Chambers does not seem to actually have had multiple significant roles in notable films. Her roles all seem to have been minor, and most of her films seem to have barely been notable. The sources here are all subpar. One is a blog post, which after reading it, I could not figure out how it was a source for Chambers, mainy just the source for a film she was in. Another is the social security death index, which is a primary source for a person's death. Since it literally lists everyone for whom social security death benefits are claimed, it has no relevance to notability. The last is IMDb, which is specifically listed as a non-notable source by Wikipedia. John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 00:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 00:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 00:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 00:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 00:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 00:47, 23 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. Sourcing is pretty much non-existent and her minor roles would not pass WP:NACTOR--Rusf10 (talk) 03:33, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I found sources and added them. She had supporting (not minor) roles in a few features, including "Melody Cruise." Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep improved version after Megalibrarygirl's stalwart work. Pam  D  10:14, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep thanks for your work, . Hmlarson (talk) 19:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes GNG per sources now showing in the piece. Carrite (talk) 14:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.