Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Randykitty (talk) 12:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Shiv Shakti Aksh Rekha

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is either a hoax or original research. Lacks credible coverage to verify and pass WP:GNG criteria. Aronitz (talk) 11:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and India.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 12:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. I've spent more time than I'd like looking at this page; I came to it after seeing it at DYK. While the bare bones of the content is supported by a source, it isn't a very strong source, and as I've said at ANI previously there are serious sourcing issues with most of the content the author has produced. At this point I'm fairly certain that the phenomenon is a manufactured one; the temples are real, of course, but if there's a documented link between them that's been given this name, I'm struggling to find evidence of it. TL;DR: there isn't substantive coverage of this phenomenon by name in good sources. Vanamonde (Talk) 12:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

User Memer ( chat )  Tribs  15:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This article is almost certainly a hoax. No sources go into the subject in-depth, and very few sources even talk about the subject. There's no evidence that he is related to any of those temples. The article goes to talk about a legend, which fails WP:NOT and is obviously false. The article goes more into detail about the temples than the subject. I think this should be speedily deleted per G3.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.