Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivajinagar Station - Swargate Skywalk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep After sources were added, the question remained of whether WP:CRYSTAL applies. To the extent that construction and completion of the very long skywalk(s) is a future event, the policy wording is "Wikipedia is not a collection of unverifiable speculation. All articles about anticipated events must be verifiable, and the subject matter must be of sufficiently wide interest that it would merit an article if the event had already occurred." Consensus is that meets that criterion. Mandsford 14:31, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Shivajinagar Station - Swargate Skywalk

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This article is about something that doesn't exist yet, and has no sources —  f c s u p e r ( How's That?, That's How! ) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) — 06:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep It does has reference from main stream media ie Pune Mirror.I have added some more reference. KuwarOnline Talk''' 16:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL until it is actually under construction. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:26, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Not sure if WP:CRYSTAL applies here. There seem to be many sources talking about this project. Even if it doesn't happen, it could still have a WP article for a project that was planned but failed to take off. Zuggernaut (talk) 19:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 18:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per KuwarOnline Zuggernaut (talk) 02:57, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep now references have been added. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Poor article but would appear to meet WP:GNG by being covered in reliable sources. Note that WP:CRYSTAL refers only to unverifiable speculation as being inappropriate - since this is neither, it meets that as well. Alzarian16 (talk) 14:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep as per Alzarian16. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 20:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and Merge: The article should be included as a section in the Shivajinagar Station and Swargate articles. WorLD8115   ( TalK )   16:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - It is sourced, passes WP:GNG and, as Alzarian16 pointed out, WP:CRYSTAL doesn't apply. --Oakshade (talk) 19:09, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.