Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivam Parikh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick   {C}  12:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Shivam Parikh

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a non-notable person. The company which he claims to be CEO of has a total of 282 google hits. The other company has 763. Statements like "Shivam Parikh is a believer that You don't need a degree in computers to start a computer related business or an IT related service." makes it apparent that the article has been written by Shivam Parikh himself. The remaining article is also filled non-notable stuff about this person. So the article must be deleted. Amdavadi123 (talk) 04:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Amdavadi123 (talk) 05:11, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as autobio spam. None of his acheivements pass the bar of notability. Hairhorn (talk) 05:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as an autobiography of a un-notable person. Google turns up his wikipage and his myspace page. Fuzbaby (talk) 04:32, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable and probable advertising.·Maunus· ƛ · 14:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge and rd to the father Keyur Parikh. JJL (talk) 00:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * delete fails notability. ^FYI his father's article is an AfD as well. The Weak Willed 10:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Isn't it odd that the person who asked for delisting - his contributions have been only focused for this entry. There is no other contribution by the user anywhere else. Sounds to me like judgemental issues. Reference:for user Id "Amdavadi123"

05:11, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivam Parikh ‎ 05:11, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyur Parikh ‎ 05:09, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/India ‎ (→India: adding 2 articles) 05:07, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Indiahn ‎ (afd) (top) 05:06, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 July 30 ‎ (Adding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyur Parikh) 05:04, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyur Parikh ‎ (starting discussion page) 04:56, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Keyur Parikh ‎ (AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keyur Parikh) 04:55, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2009 July 30 ‎ (adding Shivam Parikh) 04:54, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) N Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivam Parikh ‎ (creating discussion page) 04:41, 30 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Shivam Parikh ‎ (AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivam Parikh) (top)

Look at the time taken for each entry or access, all done in a rush.

Let me clarify certain points - Dr. Keyur Parikh happens to a very well recognized cardiologist. The ACC award that he received is globally recognized as well as goes to only one person each year. ACC happens to be the biggest cardiology board/organization in the United States, which has an affiliation with the IMA (Indian Medical Association).

Regarding, Mr. Shivam Parikh - the references provided are both substantial and certain - the comments of "dont need to have a degree" are in articles by the leading newspaper of India "The Times of India". If wikipedia officials are interested all the article copies (scanned with dates for verfication with the Times of India office) can be provided openly. Feel free to access the other reference points such as the Windows Mobile Community. Since XDA-Developers does have an open policy on number of visits it is fair to give leverage on this.

Whether you delete or not, is the choice of the community at wikipedia. One thing is for certain, there are key reference points for both articles - references have a reason for being kept and maintained. That is to verify authenticity. However, a question and doubt remains on the aunthenticity of the "complainer". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indiahn (talk • contribs) 07:54, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - it is obvious that is actually Shivam Parikh himself writing vanity articles about himself and his dad. If you go to http://www.rdosti.com/ which he claims to be the 'CEO' of, you can go to the bottom which says Copyright � India.hn, 2008. - Amdavadi123 (talk) 14:31, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.