Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiver and Fears


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:44, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Shiver and Fears

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No RSs in article nor could I find any through Google, fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. PROD contested by author. VQuakr (talk) 00:59, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  01:18, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. The series doesn't meet any of the criteria set out at the notability guidelines for books; the author isn't (yet) notable enough for a Wikipedia let alone the books. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 03:17, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. There just isn't any coverage out there for this series. I can see where the author has tried to drum up coverage, but not where this succeeded (ie, received the coverage). Also, while most book blogs would fall under WP:SPS and would be unusable for Wikipedia's purposes, I can't see where the general book blogging world has taken any notice of this author, which is actually quite telling. I'm sorry Mr. Hard, but the basic book and mainstream world seem to have taken no notice of your work. Wikipedia is not here to make up the difference and while your work exists (WP:ITEXISTS), existing is not notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:16, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails notability and may even qualify for Speedy Delete db-promo. Only reference is an Amazon link. --Jersey92 (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.