Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shizuka Hasegawa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:13, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Shizuka Hasegawa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reliable sources are listed on Eng wiki, and even the JP wiki has only 3 sources. That does not scream notability. No relevant news articles for the subject found. Subject only has Nana from Angel Tales as her main role. Delete or redirect to Nana. No sizable bio could be written for the subject in any singular way. That is a failure of WP:BIO. Article on its own also fails WP:WHYN. Sk8erPrince (talk) 14:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 December 7.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Tomohane is also a major character in Inukami! She appears in both the manga, and the anime adaptation frequently. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I hope you realize that the aforementioned character is listed below the main characters on the encyclopedia. That makes Tomohane a supporting character. Only having done one main role and one main supporting character does not warrant the subject their own article. My question is, is there any reason to even keep an article that is almost guaranteed to fail WP:BIO? --Sk8erPrince (talk) 15:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * That doesn't really mean anything as anyone can edit Wikipedia, the Inukami involved in the pack are basically the story. Have you tried looking up Tomohane and Inukami! both in Japanese? Another combo you could try is 長谷川 静香 ともはね. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * First of all, just because a character is significant in the story, that doesn't mean that they're the LEAD role. For instance, Rangiku Matsumoto is significant in Bleach, but she's not the main role (Ichigo is). Going by your logic, any character below the 7 main characters in the first section are also main roles? That means everyone is a main role in that show, then. No, that's not how it works. And even if you counted Tomohane as one of the subject's main roles, that's only two in total. Might I remind you one of the guidelines in WP:NACTOR? "[Subject] has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." Multiple, it said. Two is not our idea of multiple. Should be at least three main roles (or very important supporting characters such as the main villain) before considering anything else. I still stand by my claim that the subject only has one main role and one main supporting role. And as of this moment, I still remain unconvinced that the subject is any way, shape or form, notable at all. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 16:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I found her mentioned on Oricon, she along with other voice actors/actresses were being thanked at a festival in Akihabara where they had a talk show. . Also present are her roles . I also found biographical info about her on cinema today,, if she is making an appearance on reliable news media then she isn't a non notable voice actress. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Anyone can write a biography of someone. Whether it's from a reliable source or not, if WP:NACTOR is not met, it still means the subject is not notable. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 02:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete due to not having enough significant roles to generate enough reliable sources to meet notability. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 00:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you check the sources I provided above? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:42, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Based on significant coverage in both the Oricon article and the Cinema Today article (both of which are reliable, secondary, independent sources), she now meets WP:GNG, which means any other more specific notability guideline is irrelevant (since those are there to provide additional ways in which someone can meet the requirements if GNG can't be met). The articles are about this person, and she's mentioned in the headlines for both. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 20:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable voice actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:09, 10 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Appears in lots of main cast lists: Nagaserete Airantou (main cast), Angel Tales (main, ensemble cast) , Inukami (main cast) , Lucky Star (supporting girl) (click characters), Rocket Girls - Akane Miura (main, listed among 3 stars)  Shrine of the Morning Mist (main)  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 07:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Per KKid/Joe and Angus.SephyTheThird (talk) 11:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per well laid-out and defended rationales of Nihonjoe, and to combat career deletionists--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.