Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shmuel Tamir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. NTK 20:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Shmuel Tamir
Dosn't seem to me as a notable person, othervise it seems lika an copyvio, but I can't assert that → A z a  Toth 00:17, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Knesset member is roughly equivalent to a US Senator. He deserves a (cleaned up) article. gw e rnol 00:20, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for so many reasons. Roy  boy cr ash  fan  [[Image:Flag of Texas.svg|30px]] 00:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - a member of the Knesset is enough. Can anyone clean up the article?Montco 02:09, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment &mdash; all data seems to be talken from here (http://rajbhavanorissa.gov.in/biodata.htm), is it copyvio then? → A z a  Toth 02:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment just because information came from a real source doesn't mean it's a copyvio, especially if the information is stuff like who he is and what he has done in public life. In fact, that there is a source is a very positive thing for this article. A copyvio in this instance would be if all the wording and formatting were exactly the same, since the information is so basic and simple. Mak (talk)  05:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This comment was based on perhaps a more recent version of the article than the one you were referring to, which may have verged on copyvio. Mak (talk)  05:07, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * If anyone knows better, isn't copywrite limited to extended text? I.e., a phrase can be trademarked but not copywrited; isn't this article an example of a similar situation?  T   K   E  05:32, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Raw information is not copyrightable.BehroozZ 08:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. I'll try to clean it up a bit.   dbtfz talk 02:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep A member of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament, is a notable person .-- Dakota  ~  °  02:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, a member of the Knesset is like a senator or member of parliament. --Ter e nce Ong [[Image:Flag of Singapore.svg|30px]] 05:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per DakotaKahn. YellowPigNowNow 05:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, there should of course be at least a stub on every member of the Knesset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deville (talk • contribs)
 * Keep Valuable and relevant information.BehroozZ 08:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:18, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as notable per equivalency stated by gwernol Kuru   talk  15:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per keeps above. &mdash;-- That Guy, From That Show!  (talk) 2006-04-08 17:58Z 


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.