Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shock Value 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Timbaland. Nja 247 10:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Shock Value 2

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable unreleased album with little or no media coverage of substance. Fails WP:NALBUMS. TheJazzDalek (talk) 15:13, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —TheJazzDalek (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, since no media coverage includes MTV, MTV, again and 35,000 other Ghits. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  19:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not "no media coverage"—"little or no media coverage of substance". (And please try to keep the sarcasm in check.) Neither of those MTV links are substantial coverage of Shock Value 2. I don't know about the 35k Ghits you mention but a Google News search turns up 51 hits, with the only ones from reliable sources being the MTV.com mentions, or articles reporting on those two brief MTV articles. Media coverage, yes. Much substance? No. TheJazzDalek (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete — Lacks substantial media coverage. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 21:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC))
 * Keep, prominent artist and prominent album and plenty of ways we can add to this article. 90.214.234.59 (talk) 16:36, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No evidence of the album's prominence has been shown. If you have information that is not reflected in the article, please add it there or post it here so someone else can add it. TheJazzDalek (talk) 22:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Timbaland - The album has been talked about many times, however not enough information is added to be notable. It will still be a search by users. SE   KinG . User page.  Talk. 04:15, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete until substantial media coverage can be found. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 16:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.