Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shodor Education Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 06:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Shodor Education Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet the criteria of WP:NGO. It is not national or international in scope, and does not have substantial coverage in independent third-party sources. All of the sources in the article are related to it in some way with the exception of having won a Webby. The issue with Webby's, as the Webby Award page points out is that they are pay to enter, so I would not consider that winning one in itself necessarily constitutes notability. Doesn't return any Google News hits as well. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:51, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment I would propose that should this go without any comment after being relisted a second time that it be treated as a prod and closed as a soft delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as obvious promotionalism coupled with borderline notabililty. &#39;DGG (at NYPL)&#39; (talk) 18:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.