Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoewallet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:04, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Shoewallet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:notability guidelines. The website is defunct. The external link on the page leads to an unrelated page with a foreign language. A google search brings up nothing other than the defunct website and Wikipedia page. This is an irrelevant, defunct product with very little information. Smuckers It has to be good 21:43, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the nomination. Fifthapril (talk) 05:00, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This product would have been notable if it had caught on enough to garner significant attention, but since it did not, I too agree with the nomination. TH1980 (talk) 00:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete&mdash;Agree that this does not meet WP:N. I looked at a few related phrases via google ngram: waist pack, waist wallet, fanny pack, butt pack, shoe pack, shoe wallet and shoewallet.  Of these, only the shoe(_)wallet showed no hits, but there is no Waist wallet article, nor a Shoe pack article. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 16:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.