Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shona Chhabra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 02:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Shona Chhabra

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG (concerns: non-independent sources and trivial mentions) Appable (talk) 06:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. sst✈discuss 07:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. sst✈discuss 07:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. sst✈discuss 07:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as I see no better signs of better improvement. Pinging users interested with this subject, , , and .  SwisterTwister   talk  08:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Alt per WP:INDAFD: "Shona Chhabra" "Shona Chabra"


 * Weak Keep per slightly sneaking up on WP:GNG and thus WP:BASIC. My own  WP:BEFORE (under different spellings of name) finds she is spoken of in Deccan Herald, Sify, Times of India, Bollywood Hungama, and International Business Times tells of her nomination for 'Best Debutant Female for her role in Savaal.  It's weak but undeniable. Even if deleted, the article can be resurrected.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd consider the Sify and Deccan Herald sources trivial mentions and not useful for establishing notability because they consist only of an image or are a trivial mention of the actor (one sentence at best) in a multi-paragraph summary of the movie. Appable (talk) 14:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable actress, Fails NACTOR & GNGJosu4u (talk) 10:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The lead role in Sawaal is not quite enough. Biwom (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:BEFORE shows coverage for several films. not just the one... and the quantity of her films is irrelevant... for in her meeting WP:BASIC we need not delete simply because anyone feels in error that a subordinate SNG is failed. A closer can disregard weak arguments as this is not a simple count of votes. WP:BASIC over-rules WP:ENT, not the other way 'round. Cheers.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Let me try to be clear and concise... Yes, you're right about the press coverage, and I was initially thinking of using some of your links to improve the article, but then it turned out to be mostly stuff I would not be confortable to write in a BLP. My "vote" is not based on NACTOR, it's based on HARM, for whatever that's worth. Regards, Biwom (talk) 15:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - per MichaelQSchmidt.  Ya sh!  11:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with User:MichaelQSchmidt. Somehow don't think a similar American actor would have received a deletion nom in the same circumstances (WP:GEOBIAS). AusLondonder (talk) 14:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.