Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shonen Jump Championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete.  Soxred  93  04:36, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Shonen Jump Championship

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable championship. If they have several a month, just how important can they be? Corvus cornix talk  20:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. → Christian .И  21:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Nomination has bizarre logic. The frequency of this event is evidence of notability rather than otherwise.  If the event had occured only once, the nomination might say that it was just a flash-in-the-pan news event.  Colonel Warden (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:NOTADVERTISING; article appears to be a list of those people winning the competition only, and seems to simply promote the competition. --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 21:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not Yu-Gi-Oh Wikia and this article sounds like a self-promotion. Zero Kitsune (talk) 03:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nominated on the wrong grounds. It is most assuredly notable. If the content sounds too much like advertising then it should be changed, but deleting it on the grounds of lacking notability is a poor precedent for the article's future if anyone wishes to write a better version. -Rushyo (talk) 18:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. World championship of Yu-Gi-Oh!: has obvious notability and needs an article in Wikipedia. However, a mounthly tournament has problems of notability: it is more suitable in Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia, not in Wikipedia. Zero Kitsune (talk) 03:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.