Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shonlock


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  Sandstein  05:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Shonlock

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Concerns about notability. There are assertions of significance within the article, but these are not backed up with reliable sources. Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUS per verifiability.  Catfish Jim  &#38; the soapdish  22:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources to be found. Endofskull (talk) 23:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - A WP:SPS (the subject's own website) is not a WP:RS … the other "reference" is dubious as well. Happy Editing! &mdash;  00:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Assertions of notability are not backed up by reliable sources. Some Wiki Editor (talk) 11:05, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 11:57, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep I just added some refs, there's nothing huge but there's some. I could go either way on this one. Robman94 (talk) 21:10, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Robman94's additions. Phearson (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per the new references, just enough to squeak by WP:MUSICBIO criterion #1. Also, he has charted on the Billboard Christian Songs chart.  Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 00:46, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep based on Houston Chron interview, Billboard chart. Close, but enough.  --joe deckertalk to me 04:49, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Per sourcing/Paul Erik.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.