Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shooting Fish

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep after rewrite. - Joolz 11:50, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Shooting Fish
completing nomination from August 5. no vote. Nabla 00:37:22, 2005-09-02 (UTC)


 * Delete. Looks like nonsense and nothing to indicate of this is real. Sir might like the Uncyclopedia though? -- High (Hopes) 05:59, 5 August 2005 (UTC) Keep - now refers to the film rather than the fanciful imaginings of someone with a curious but misplaced creative streak. -- High (Hopes) 17:39, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Deleteing this article is like shooting fish in a barrel. Keep and expand stub. Thanks to Sabine's Sunbird and Hiding for the rewrite. Capitalistroadster 23:25, 4 September 2005 (UTC) Capitalistroadster 03:33, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not a sport, and very unsporting. Geogre 10:49, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep rewrite, although I suppose the nonsense in the history will have to stay. What's worse is that I've seen the movie.  Geogre 12:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per bullet! )|---(( '<  ...  UniReb 11:01, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless verified. the wub  "?/!"  13:19, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I've been bold and edited it to represent the reasonably notable 1997 film of the same name. The links to this page seem to already reflect this usage. Keep. Sabine's Sunbird 21:25, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sabine's Sunbird above who beat me to it. Note page linked to from both Kate Beckinsale and Stuart Townsend. Hiding talk 21:29, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, after changing a previous vote to delete, per Hiding. Good catch. Deadsalmon 21:45, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten. Notable film. Flowerparty 21:50, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - In light of newly provided information about the article, I personally deem it Wiki-worthy! )|---(( '< ...  UniReb 00:17, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep rewritten article. the wub  "?/!"  10:07, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten, though of course it needs expanding. --Oppolo 15:32, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - major UK film. --MacRusgail 14:33, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.