Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopaccino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Shopaccino

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NCORP. My online search only brings up passing mentions and press releases. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 14:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 14:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 14:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Draftify I would like to put this back to draft as I believe reliable independent sources can be found. Amirah   talk  14:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Draftification should not be used for obviously non-notable subjects—Google News only has nine results for "Shopaccino", all of which are passing mentions or press releases. You yourself moved this to mainspace, and you had ample opportunity to find sources while it was still in draftspace. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * This is an Indian company and I believe there are also foreign language sources, but I need time to find them and get translations. Amirah   talk  18:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Technically Shopaccino is not a company, it's a product-line only (for the company called "iSolution Microsystems Private Limited"). Joojay (talk) 21:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are correct. iSolution Microsystem is an Indian company. Amirah   talk  10:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete -- fails to meet NCORP criteria, also very poor media coverage (almost nothing besides brief mentions).-- Melaleuca alternifolia  |  talk  19:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete – this one clearly fails WP:NCORP and WP:PRODUCT, as per nomination. I am confused why anyone would even write a stub article like this one? Joojay (talk) 21:22, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * As I said above there are foreign language sources available, and I would like to put the article back to draft in order to develop it. Amirah   talk  10:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * you decided to send this to an article status, and you personally remove it from draft. However you have time right now to add these new citations. Right now I am not seeing any movement or work happening and it's been a few days. Joojay (talk) 11:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, it will take me some time to do so, that is why I have asked to get the article moved back to draft. Amirah   talk  11:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Lord Bolingbroke Please tell me how you identify that an article is a 'press release'. There are two sources quoted in the article. Do you consider them to be press releases, and if so why? Amirah   talk  11:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The Digital Journal citation literally has a media contact at the bottom of the page, this is a PR news release.. Joojay (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * See WP:PRSOURCE. The TechRadar source is not significant coverage, per WP:CORPDEPTH. The Digital Journal source is very obviously a press release, as mentioned—the byline of the article is literally "GetNews Published". – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 19:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:36, 30 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.