Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopaholic Abroad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Overall consensus is to Keep (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 20:51, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Shopaholic Abroad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not finding any third-party references about this book; I don't believe it meets WP:NBOOKS. Mikeblas (talk) 08:27, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Shopaholic_(novels) where it is mentioned as my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing significant aside from some results at News and a few at highbeam. SwisterTwister   talk  06:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect works: The book was published by Dell, and it has reviews by very high profile RS. At the same time, it seems to have set no worlds on fire, and the article is an extraordinary gush about the novel. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Shopaholic series is among the best known in chick lit. This book and the first in the series were made into a film. A look at the world cat entry suggests that this book meets WP:NBOOK with reviews in Glamour, Waterstones Books Quarterly, Cosmopolitan, Mirror, and Sunday Mirror. There are also reviews from Publishers Weekly, WWD, and Kirkus Reviews. Many of the reviews can only be found by searching the alternative title Shopaholic Takes Manhattan. gobonobo  + c 21:13, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per . Easily meets GNG. —Мандичка YO 😜 13:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. There are some reviews on the article and something else to take into consideration (as Gobonobo has stated) is that the Shopaholic film was actually an adaptation of the first two books in the series, which includes this novel. It's enough to where this would pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  17:58, 4 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.