Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopless


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7, there is no real claim to importance as a small startup website and only one independent source. Speedy tag was removed by a COI editor so no need to wait the full seven days. Fences &amp;  Windows  17:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Shopless

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I find no evidence of notability from a web search. At most one source cited in the article is substantial coverage in an possibly independent reliable source, and it isn't clear to me that it's independent. I A7ed the article but somebody removed the tag. Largoplazo (talk) 13:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 13:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 13:10, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 13:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete The A7 tag likely should not have been removed in the first place (pending confirmation at Sockpuppet investigations/Hoomanbahreini). Regardless, the article is promotional fluff, sourced almost entirely to press releases; the NZBusiness "source" is more blockquotes from Bahreini than actual reporting. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. DanCherek (talk) 16:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.