Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopping Centres in Dublin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Pigman ☿ 18:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Shopping Centres in Dublin

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A simple list of shopping centres in Dublin. The page was sort of a place holder where all the shopping centres listed were going to be merged. There was no consensus to merge, so this page is kinda unnecessary now. The talk page contains the merge/deletion discussion. Rocket000 (talk) 07:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article has potential for expansion. It can have a discussion on the effect of shopping centers on Dublin, how the shopping centers evolved, etc. Maybe one day it can look like this great article: Shopping malls in New Jersey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brewcrewer (talk • contribs) 07:41, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep There is the potential for expansion, as Brewcrewer says. Bláthnaid 11:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't see any point in this; it is a fairly random list of just a few of Dublin's shopping centres. (Sarah777 (talk) 14:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC))
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a directory, nor an indiscriminate collection of info, nor a travel guide. Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 22:35, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, as what Brewcrewer says. Redrocketboy 18:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - After considering the above comments, To me it would make more sense to make individual articles about each Mall, then a 'parent' article describing their overall effect on the town/area... not the other way around. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  03:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this doesn't meet the classic purposes described in WP:LIST--it provides no "valuable information" beyond a name (which violates WP:NOT), and has no "navigation purpose", as the malls don't appear to have articles (or be individually notable). Finally, per WP:LIST, "any lists which exist primarily for development or maintenance purposes (such as a list of red link articles needed) should be in project or user space not the main space, if the list is not otherwise encyclopedic." &mdash; Scientizzle 17:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Scientizzle. Violates WP:LIST.  Editors wishing to keep this have had since 25 November to rescue it. Bearian 17:55, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.