Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopping encylopedia

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 09:32, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Shopping encylopedia
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Advert. Enochlau 06:25, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Self-promo. Ad. Non-notable. Vanity. etc. Trilobite (Talk) 10:58, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable ad. Wikipedia is not a wiki about encyclopedias. --Deathphoenix 14:34, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete adver-cruft. HyperZonktalk 17:06, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * ... and no-one appears to have noticed Shopperpedia, which has quietly lurked for 4 months. Uncle G 18:38, 2005 Feb 17 (UTC)
 * Although you must say that the Shopperpedia article is far more objective, providing a description of what it does. However,if you feel that it's an advert too, slap a vfd on it as well... Enochlau 22:52, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:18, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)