Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopwise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rustan's. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:37, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Shopwise

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Proposing a deletion and then redirect as my first attempt was contested. Shopwise is not independently notable and should be redirected to it's parent company. Praxidicae (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete or Merge to parent article. primary sources do not advance WP:notability. There is no need to branch out a title using primary sources just to have a separate title. Otr500 (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Rustan's. The brand seems to be not notable enough to stand on its own. The article also looks like it violates WP:DIRECTORY -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:22, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. (And yes, by all means a redirect can then be created.) The article has no independent sources at all, nor is there any evidence anywhere that this brand is notable independently of its parent company. There is no point in merging, as the bare facts of the brand's existence, its launch date, etc are already in the article about the parent company, and other than that the Shopwise article consists almost entirely of a table listing all it branches, which is excessive listing and not needed. (As Lenticel rightly said above, a violation of WP:DIRECTORY.) JamesBWatson (talk) 15:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Viztor (talk) 02:57, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect would be the sensible solution.  HighKing++ 20:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.