Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Short-order marketing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete g11, nothing borderline about this advertising. NawlinWiki 18:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Short-order marketing

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Borderline advertising for creator,little or no explanation of what the concept is. Also seems to be a borderline candidate for WP:Complete Bollocks Eddie.willers 01:09, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Maybe not WP:BOLLOCKS, but not notable, no verifiability, no sources in here listed whatsoever, appears to be a neologism, and big time WP:COI, as it was created by the promoter.  Remote possibility of spam. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds like an advertisement for one company's peculiar (trademarked?) name for their services. -RustavoTalk/Contribs 02:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable and somewhat confusing --Cryo921 02:39, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Obvious case of self-promotion, bordering spam. Not notable in any way, filled with weasel words. JdeJ 03:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, clear vanispamcruftisement with blatant WP:COI authorship. --Dhartung | Talk 08:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, put it out of its misery. Sachabrunel 12:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, most vehemently. Entirely vague and buzzword laden, a perfect example of complete bollocks in my opinion.  Would you want anyone capable of committing this kind of prose in charge of publicizing anything?  - Smerdis of Tlön 14:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources, little to no assertion of reliability, promotional and advertising at best, nonsense at worst.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 14:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.