Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shortbread House of Edinburgh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  09:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Shortbread House of Edinburgh

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Sources are not reliable or significant. Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲  talk  08:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲   talk  08:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. –– 𝗙𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗗𝘂𝗱𝗲   talk  08:27, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non notable company. Article was supported by low quality PR and paid sources, until these were removed by the creator in reaction to a PROD notice. Now supported by a passing mention in a trivial/PR publication, and a blog post. The whole thing is a COI/Paid creation by a throwaway account. --Tagishsimon (talk) 08:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: The Chelsea Market Basket blog, which showcases connected firms (see the use of "our" on the page) is not a WP:RS. The article creator's removal of text before deleting the PROD notice included some other references, such as the Scottish Field summary of the Great Taste awards; the firm gained several awards but there were around 300 such awards and I note it is a paid-for self-submission award . These fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches find brief coverage such as this complaint regarding food description protection in 2015 but that is not coverage about this firm. Overall, I am not seeing evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. not enough news to justify notability. Webmaster862 (talk) 23:27, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, sadly. I feel this food item probably is notable, as it wouldn't be carried by so many online retailers if it weren't. But there's just very little coverage outside of the local area, and many are bare mentions or redlink media. —valereee (talk) 16:40, 17 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.