Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoshurbari Zindabad 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Mythdon ( talk  •  contribs ) 03:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Shoshurbari Zindabad 2

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Couldn't find any sources for reviews for WP:NFILM by WP:NFO, if the film is released as stated in the infobox. Going by the article, [presumably only] Bengali-language sources exist. Perhaps locals could find more sources? — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Nobody seems eager to delete it. More info/input is needed. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MelanieN (talk) 01:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment this film was actually released, it might be worth checking for non-English sources. User:力 (powera, π,  ν ) 17:13, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Syrongly Keep - features two leading actors and the film is a much anticipated film. Abbasulu (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep There is post-release media coverage. That sets it apart from the average Bangladeshi film. There isn't much of a culture of film criticism in the country, and most films, after much promotional hype, are never mentioned again after their release is announced. Although there are no reviews, there is media coverage of the fact that it ran for 4+ weeks, which is a good performance. The coverage isn't deep, but there's just enough that we could write something about the audience reception, taking the article slightly beyond a summary-only description of the film. --Worldbruce (talk) 07:24, 3 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.