Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shotton Steel RFC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No opposition to the deletion of the page after 2 weeks of discussion. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:45, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Shotton Steel RFC

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

no indication of WP:notability. Only source given is to a non-existent web page. 5th level amateur club. Disputed prod. Does not meet guidelines at WikiProject Rugby union/Notability. noq (talk) 18:14, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 23 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete There is no evidence of notability.--Charles (talk) 08:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak delete and redirect to WRU Division Three North. There is some evidence of non-routine coverage, for example this about the club's hosting a rugby competition and this about the club's marking of the death of a junior player, but I doubt it's convincing enough to pass WP:NCORP. The club has been going for over 40 years, but this is not long in comparison with many other clubs. The club also convincingly won its league this year, so maybe will reach the 'notability' criteria sometime soon! Sionk (talk) 17:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | gab _ 14:06, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.