Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Show-Me Institute (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 20:51, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Show-Me Institute
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unfinished AFD; once again I seem to be the ONLY PERSON ON THE WHOLE PROJECT CAPABLE OF FINISHING REDLINKED AFDs. Seems adlike. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, TPH, in the process of Twinkle messing up this AfD, I found that the article had been through AfD before, with the nominator withdrawing it. I read through the discussion and agreed that that article should stay, so I didn't try to resurrect the second AfD. The article does need work to reduce the ad-like stuff, but I think there's enough to meet the notability standards. Thanks anyway, TenPound. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 07:56, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep the organization's activities seem to get regular coverage in Missouri media since it started. I removed the potentially ad-like sections of the article and added some references. Mike Linksvayer (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable organization that is frequently cited in local media. A need for wikification =/= cause to delete. DickClarkMises (talk) 18:58, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Notworthly thinktank thats mentioned regularly. scope_creep (talk) 21:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a notable organization as established through press coverage.--Chaser (talk) 15:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.