Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Showing Up (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Showing Up (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Film does not meet standards for main space article as described in WP:NFF, all sources provided merely indicate casting/production team announcements and none indicate that the film has entered main production, should be drafted until such coverage is received BOVINEBOY 2008 09:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:54, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Draftify per nom. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:25, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It has been moved to Draft space twice but keeps being moved back to main space. Liz Read! Talk! 01:42, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - and salt, preventing recreation without admin involvement. Would have agreed with the draftify suggestion, if not for the history.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:36, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom. Non-notable. Kolma8 (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Production has commenced in Portland, will add article to prove it. Cinemacriterion (talk) 14:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Being in production doesn't make it notable per WP:NFILM, unless there was something significant about the production itself, which there does not appear to be. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * To the contrary, I think the level of top talent involved in the production in front of and behind the camera justifies it as notable. It's not a home movie. TheMovieGuy
 * "Top talent" involved is irrelevant, as notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. No one is saying that this film won't eventually meet notability requirements of WP:NFF or WP:NFILM, but as of right now they don't. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Draftify per WP:CRYSTALBALL (or just move it to a sandbox/delete the main article idk). Anonymous 7481 (talk) 00:43, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Changing to delete per Otr500. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Film is in production and is well sourced, well written. It meets notability and should be stay in the mainspace. TheMovieGuy
 * You really need to read the requirements for an unreleased future film at WP:NFF. Donaldd23 (talk) 11:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete or Draftify per WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:NFF.4meter4 (talk) 03:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Draftify would be an option but per above we are rehashing (moved twice) a promotional or advertising want to have the article published before it passes the criteria. Considering this, and the fact that those interested or involved will surely get started on another one as soon as possible, deletion is the proper choice. I don't think salt is an alternative, no matter how aggitated we get, because future notability is possible. I didn't look at who was involved in the moving, if it is just a sincere desire to create the article or something else, but that might be considered.  --  Otr500 (talk) 14:22, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.