Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shpadoinkel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Shpadoinkel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable term. Oscarthecat (talk) 21:56, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Given the content (or lack thereof) it might qualify for A7. treelo  radda  22:41, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7, not of note. Trevor Marron (talk) 00:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It doesn't qualify for A7, but it would have been a perfect candidate for WP:PRODding since deletion will almost certainly be uncontroversial. +Angr 06:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No citations, lacks notability, almost no encyclopedic content. Cnilep (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.