Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shree Devi Entertainers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. czar 05:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Shree Devi Entertainers

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non notable film production company. No significant coverage. Citations doesnt give coverage to the company but to the movies they have produced. Fails NCORP and GNG Pillechan  (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ)  22:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Pillechan   (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ)  22:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Pillechan   (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ)  22:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Pillechan   (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ)  22:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete As per nom. I marked it for speedy. Fails WP:NCORP. DMySon (talk) 07:18, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The production company itself has won three awards for best film for RangiTaranga. It was nominated for an award for a second film, Avane Srimannarayana. Generally for companies in the arts we extend WP:CREATIVE  to cover them as well if the production company has been recognized with a notable arts award. 4meter4 (talk) 04:01, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete It did not say how many Oscars he has received yet. Once he gets a couple of those, build the page. Not now. Ode+Joy (talk) 23:49, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Um, this article is not about a person but a company. Also there are other notable awards for films beside the Oscars. This is not a valid policy based argument. It’s not even clear Ode+Joy read the article based on the reference to a company as a “he”.4meter4 (talk) 03:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Close without result. Nominator is a sock, and socks don't have standing to start AfDs.  If this should be deleted, then let a good faith editor renominate it.—<b style="font-family: Verdana; color: Maroon;">S Marshall</b> T/C 09:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Given that there are now multiple good faith !votes, the AfD can continue and stand on its own merit. MarioGom (talk) 14:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Discounting the blocked sock, I see a "delete", a "weak keep", an editor who doesn't seem to have understood the discussion, and a "close without result"... I'd be surprised if anyone can find a consensus in all that, and WP:RELIST rather precludes a third relisting.   I'm not at all sure it can stand on its own merit!—<b style="font-family: Verdana; color: Maroon;">S Marshall</b> T/C 19:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that a no consensus close is what is best at this point. The nominator has been blocked permanently as a sock and that leaves only one cogent delete argument by an editor in good standing, one cogent keep vote made by me, and a confusing delete vote by an editor who may not have actually read the article or looked at the sources based on their misidentifying the subject of the article as a human being instead of a company.4meter4 (talk) 03:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.