Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shree Rapaka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:46, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Shree Rapaka

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NACTOR, WP:BIO Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 23:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC) Shree Rapaka (or Shri Rapaka)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 23:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 23:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 23:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 23:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - An article should speak for itself and explain why its subject is notable, and this one does not establish either acting notability or general notability. (There is no special notability guideline for costume design, so that general notability is required.)
 * This page was already moved from article space to draft space once, and moved back by its author without even a statement that the reviewer's concerns have been addressed (because they haven't been), so that now a deletion discussion is needed.
 * A review of the references shows that there are mostly photographs of the actress, likely in clothing that she has designed for herself, with a lot of verbiage about her beauty, and no significant coverage.


 * Delete. I agree with the source analysis, and would add that this looks like covert spam. --bonadea contributions talk 18:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Gossips, interviews and puff pieces do not meet the requirements of GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 08:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG upcoming a case of WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.