Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shree Upahar Gruh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that there are no sources that provide significant coverage, and there is no indication of notability outside of that guideline. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:45, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Shree Upahar Gruh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

References do not establish notability. Inclusion in a "food lover's guide" from 1994 and comparable restaurant-guide articles isn't enough. (The referenced H. Kanitkar is a cricketer who happens to like the food there; to put that in U.S.-centric language, a cheesesteak place in Philadelphia that Bryce Harper praises on ESPN doesn't solely for that reason become Wikipedia-notable. Pat's Steaks is notable for many other cultural reasons that this likely comparable restaurant isn't.)  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  18:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  18:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  18:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete from what I can see, this article is best at original research. The place itself is not notable. References given are mostly primary source or secondary with trivial mention. Delete it.-Krishna&#39;s flute (talk) 01:38, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep (Article creator) To give background, the subject is an eating place located in Pune, among India's largest cities and amongst the 100 most populous cities in the world, so when there is mention of the place as Pune's best etc., it is best in one of India's and world's largest cities. There are six (five, when nominated) independent, reliable sources referenced, while the nominator only mentions two. The first informs about celebrity endorsement, and is dated January 2000. The second is dated December 2008, the title is "In search of Misal", and the subject is one of the five places mentioned, given its own paragraph.The third from September, 2002, gives the subject a notable mention amongst multi-cuisine and multi-class eating places in Pune, with its name in bold type and its own paragraph. The fourth source as mentioned is from 1994 is an international food guide good enough to be referenced by the Wall Street Journal. The fifth source is a twenty and half minute video, dedicated to the subject, in the popular programme Aamhi Saare Khavayye in 2012.


 * Thus the subject clearly confirms to WP:ORGIN that is " the organization or product has attracted the notice of reliable sources unrelated to the organization or product." The mention in sources is spread over 24 years, 1994-2018. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I request Krishna&#39;s flute to look up the definition of the terms original research, primary sources, secondary sources and what is not "trivial" since they have used them in justification of their vote. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 13:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Listings, listings, listings. They don't suffice; notability rests on in-depth coverage. Granted, this restaurant has a few more mentions than random anonymous food stall XYZ, but there's still quite a gap to "of encyclopedic interest". -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:13, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. &#x222F; WBG converse 06:52, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete At present the article is pure (pardon the pun...oh dear) WP:PROMO.  That might not be a problem if it was possible to establish notability and the article could be amended, however, there is no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. The CRICINFO, Mirror,  BusinessTravellerIndia, Penguin 1994 and Condé Nast Traveller India references are all advertorial and/or directory listings - these cannot constitute notability.  WP:CHAIN does not apply (nothing significant about the location - a single TV episode is incidental). --Goldsztajn (talk) 11:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.